Axiom vs Trojan: web terminal or Telegram bot?

Axiom Pro vs Trojan is a comparison of two interfaces more than two fee schedules. Trojan began as a Telegram trading bot and has added a web terminal, according to its official docs. Axiom is a browser-based trading terminal with a non-custodial wallet, published cashback tiers, Hyperliquid perpetuals and wallet trackers, and it has no official Telegram bot at all.

The Axiom details below come from its docs, homepage and changelog, checked on 17 September 2026. For Trojan we confirmed the product shape and the copy-trading feature on docs.trojan.com; its fee figure comes from third-party sources and is labeled that way. Gaps are marked "not covered in our research". We earn a referral commission from Axiom.

Axiom vs Trojan at a glance

Axiom's cells come from its own documentation. Trojan's fee cells are third-party figures; a "not covered" cell is a gap in our research, not a claim that Trojan lacks the feature.

How do Axiom and Trojan fees compare?

On the figures available, the two sit within a fraction of a percentage point of each other, and only Axiom's number is verified at source. Axiom's docs state a 1% fee with SOL cashback across seven tiers, from Wood at 0.95% net to Champion at 0.75% net, plus a 10% fee discount for users who join through a referral link. Trojan's 1%, or 0.9% with a referral, is consistent across CoinGecko's Telegram-bot roundup and reviews, but we did not find it stated on docs.trojan.com.

Using a $1,000 trade purely for arithmetic: a new Axiom account pays $9.50 at Wood and $7.50 at Champion, while Trojan's reported rates give $10, or $9 with a referral. Axiom does not publish tier thresholds or how the referral discount stacks with cashback, so 0.95% is the honest planning number. Fees will not decide this comparison; interface and custody will.

Network costs are separate on both. On Axiom's Solana side the priority fee and the bribe each default to 0.001 SOL. The Axiom Pro fees breakdown covers the tiers, and the Axiom Trade referral page explains what the docs do and do not say about the 10%.

Where does your wallet live on each platform?

Axiom's wallet is created at signup and described on its homepage and in its Terms as non-custodial and secured by Turnkey; Trojan's wallet is generated by the bot. That is the deepest difference between the two, and it matters more than the fee.

On Axiom, the seed phrase is shown at signup and is accessible in settings afterward, and the docs recommend importing it into Phantom, Rabby or Solflare so you hold the keys independently. The Terms state that Axiom does not store copies of keys and does not custody your tokens, which also means Axiom cannot recover a lost phrase. The trade-off is that a logged-in browser session can still trade, and automated orders rely on Turnkey's policy-based signing; the malicious extensions Socket documented in September 2026 stole exactly that session data.

On Trojan, the bot creates the wallet for you and signs your trades. In practice, whoever controls your Telegram account controls that wallet, so Telegram's own two-step verification becomes as important as a seed phrase. Whether Trojan lets you export the private key, and how the key is stored, is not covered in our research; read Trojan's docs on that point before you deposit anything. We found no public security audit for Axiom, and Trojan's audit status is not covered either.

Does Trojan or Axiom have copy trading?

Trojan does, according to its official docs. Axiom does not document it: its docs and changelog describe a wallet tracker for up to 500 wallets with groups and transfer alerts, plus manual one-click following, but no automated mirroring of another wallet's trades.

If automated copying is the center of your strategy, that is the strongest reason on this page to pick Trojan. Third-party pages claiming native Axiom copy trading exist, but they contradict the official material, and our Axiom copy trade page explains the manual workflow that is actually available. Two cautions apply to copy trading anywhere: a tracked wallet's past results say nothing about its next trade, and a copied buy always lands after the leader's, which on a fast-moving token can be a very different price.

Telegram bot vs web terminal: what changes day to day?

Axiom is built around the screen; Trojan is built around chat. On Axiom, discovery happens in Axiom Pulse with its New Pairs, Final Stretch and Migrated columns and filters for bundles, snipers, insiders and dev holdings, and execution runs through Quick Buy, the Instant Trade panel with hotkeys, limit orders dragged on the chart, a migration sniper and three saved presets for slippage, priority fee, bribe and MEV mode.

A Telegram bot puts trading inside a chat window on any phone that has Telegram, with no separate app. What Trojan's menus look like and which of these tools its web terminal matches is not covered in our research. Axiom's mobile story is a responsive website: no official iOS or Android app, APK or extension exists, and the Axiom Trade mobile page explains why store listings are unaffiliated. Telegram on Axiom is an alert channel only, added in August 2025; there is no official bot, as the sniper bot page covers.

Choose Trojan or choose Axiom?

Running both is reasonable: research and chart on Axiom, fire quick trades from Telegram, and keep the larger balance in the wallet you can back up yourself. If you add Axiom, the Axiom Trade guide walks through signup, the seed phrase backup and a first trade.

What risks apply whichever you pick?

The asset is the biggest risk on either platform: most memecoins go to zero, and neither a bot nor a terminal changes that. Account theft comes second. For Axiom, reported losses involve look-alike domains such as auth-axiom.trade, a fake mobile app and browser extensions that stole logged-in sessions, so log in only at axiom.trade and keep third-party extensions away from it. For any Telegram bot, take the bot's handle from its official docs, because impersonator bots with similar names are a standard scam pattern.

Axiom carries a platform-specific note. In February 2026, investigator ZachXBT alleged that an Axiom employee used internal support tools to look up users' wallets; Axiom said it removed access and would investigate, and we found no published outcome. Axiom's Terms cap liability at $100. Trojan's incident history and terms are not covered in our research, so ask the same questions there.

Sources: Trojan docs, CoinGecko: Solana Telegram trading bots (Trojan fee figure), Axiom docs: Fees, Axiom docs: Referral program, Turnkey case study: Axiom. Checked 17 September 2026.